post by @AlejandroA94408
back to @AlejandroA94408's posts@squatsons Attacking forces require at least 3-1 for any kind of hope for success. Usually 5-1 is better. Attacking forces sustain way more casualties.
Dec 8 2024 4:11:34 PM
- 1
- 0
- 1
- 17368
- 0
- 604
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
in reply to:
(tweet not in archive - ID: 1865776913828270572)
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
references to this tweet:
quote tweets:
пiтго
@PETR0GRAD
That's not in terms of raw manpower; but in terms of firepower. A smaller, elite, armoured force, supported by drones, air-superiority, and artillery, is going to defeat a larger force that doesn't have these advantages.
Use common sense. x.com/AlejandroA9440… (⊹)
Dec 8 2024 6:57:24 PM
Use common sense. x.com/AlejandroA9440… (⊹)
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0