post by @PETR0GRAD
back to @PETR0GRAD's postsThat's not in terms of raw manpower; but in terms of firepower. A smaller, elite, armoured force, supported by drones, air-superiority, and artillery, is going to defeat a larger force that doesn't have these advantages.
Use common sense. x.com/AlejandroA9440…
Use common sense. x.com/AlejandroA9440…
Dec 8 2024 6:57:24 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 2354
- 0
- 0
links:
| https://t.co/... | shown as | goes to |
|---|---|---|
| oNyJGzFEtS | x.com/AlejandroA9440… | https://twitter.com/AlejandroA94408/status/1865791336923664670 (⊹) (archive.org) |
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
quote tweet of:
The Sad Crab
@AlejandroA94408
@squatsons Attacking forces require at least 3-1 for any kind of hope for success. Usually 5-1 is better. Attacking forces sustain way more casualties.
Dec 8 2024 4:11:34 PM
- 1
- 0
- 1
- 1
- 0
- 604