post by @RADFEM_TEMUJIN
back to @RADFEM_TEMUJIN's posts@GenocideAfrica Look : Irkutsk sent 1.76 trillion rubles to the FEDERAL budget (mainly mineral tax, of which 100% goes to the FEDERAL budget)
Irkutsk had a REGIONAL budget deficit of 13 billion rubles. If even just 1% (!!!) of mineral tax remained in the region it'd have been 4 billion surplus.
Irkutsk had a REGIONAL budget deficit of 13 billion rubles. If even just 1% (!!!) of mineral tax remained in the region it'd have been 4 billion surplus.
Nov 4 2024 3:09:43 PM
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 50453
- 0
- 2
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
Explaining Wampyric Vostochnoskifyanka Brutality.
registered Apr 6 2023 10:05 AM
206 following
456 followers
in reply to:
nitrrogen
@GenocideAfrica
@RADFEM_TEMUJIN But I thought all the minerals come from Siberia and that Irkutsk contributes as much to taxed as Moscow? These charts all contradict eachother. pic.x.com/aSNveOxjaH
Nov 4 2024 2:34:26 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
references to this tweet:
replies:
nitrrogen
@GenocideAfrica
@RADFEM_TEMUJIN Okay. Moscow STILL has contributed more to the federal budget irregardless.
Nov 4 2024 3:10:58 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
♄ ⵡⴰⵍⵉⵔⴽⴷⵓⵅⵍⵓⵏ
@RADFEM_TEMUJIN
@GenocideAfrica This is data from two different years to be fair (2022 & 2019) but the point still stands : Irkutsk sends way more to the center than it receives for its deficit. The center lives off the taxation of Irkutsk, not the other way around.
Nov 4 2024 3:12:20 PM
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 5