post by @TheEternalKraut
back to @TheEternalKraut's posts@nitrrogen__ Only in purchasing power and I doubt it. All of the former Eastern Bloc/Ex Soviets states underwent economic shock and it was particularly bad because the Balts decided to build themselves from the ground up instead of using existing Soviet institutions. The growth rate is larger
Aug 2 2024 1:09:12 PM
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 18210
- 0
- 5
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
Germanic Supremacist|Utilitarian|Eugenicist|Wehraboo|Eliminative Materialist|Ethnonationalist Hopscotch player|Arch-Germanic Slavaphobe| Dis: drangnachosten88
- Bavaria, Germany
registered Jul 20 2024 12:11 AM
970 following
796 followers
in reply to:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut They wouldn't be more prosperous but it did not hold back the economy. Roughly the same trend is seen there with the "dip" post 1991 and then higher economic growth afterwards. With the gdp/c in 2010 looking about the same as it would if the USSR continued the same growth. pic.twitter.com/4f2hlusRxy
Aug 2 2024 1:06:36 PM
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 4
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
Explaining Russian brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers
references to this tweet:
replies:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut That doesn't change the fact that the USSR did not "hold them back". The baltics were quite rich and almost on the level of western Europe. pic.twitter.com/n9mzIVSDiK
Aug 2 2024 1:12:42 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0