post by @TheEternalKraut
back to @TheEternalKraut's posts@nitrrogen__ Barely? And thats not evidence that they didn’t hold them back. The USSR also had plenty of more negative economic effects on the Baltics beyond economics like shipping war veterans to settle in Latvia that the state would later need to take care of for instance
Aug 2 2024 1:16:29 PM
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 18210
- 0
- 5
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
Germanic Supremacist|Utilitarian|Eugenicist|Wehraboo|Eliminative Materialist|Ethnonationalist Hopscotch player|Arch-Germanic Slavaphobe| Dis: drangnachosten88
- Bavaria, Germany
registered Jul 20 2024 12:11 AM
970 following
796 followers
in reply to:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut That doesn't change the fact that the USSR did not "hold them back". The baltics were quite rich and almost on the level of western Europe. pic.twitter.com/n9mzIVSDiK
Aug 2 2024 1:12:42 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
Explaining Russian brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers
references to this tweet:
replies:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut 1974 according to the charts the baltics were like 14-15,000 and western Europe was 19-20,000. Comparatively with how poor they were pre WW2 and with the rest of the USSR - economically it was a net+. The economic effects of extra welfare due to war veterans is negligible.
Aug 2 2024 1:19:28 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0