post by @TheEternalKraut
back to @TheEternalKraut's posts@nitrrogen__ Thats a pretty big disparity especially considering how ruined France Britain Germany etc were by the war
You could make the argument that they would have been poorer without the USSR (kinda easy) but they would have been way better off in the hands of the West
You could make the argument that they would have been poorer without the USSR (kinda easy) but they would have been way better off in the hands of the West
Aug 2 2024 1:24:37 PM
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 18210
- 0
- 5
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
Germanic Supremacist|Utilitarian|Eugenicist|Wehraboo|Eliminative Materialist|Ethnonationalist Hopscotch player|Arch-Germanic Slavaphobe| Dis: drangnachosten88
- Bavaria, Germany
registered Jul 20 2024 12:11 AM
970 following
796 followers
in reply to:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut 1974 according to the charts the baltics were like 14-15,000 and western Europe was 19-20,000. Comparatively with how poor they were pre WW2 and with the rest of the USSR - economically it was a net+. The economic effects of extra welfare due to war veterans is negligible.
Aug 2 2024 1:19:28 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
Explaining Russian brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers
references to this tweet:
replies:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut They probably would be better off in the hands of the west because America had more economic rescources but that's not what I'm saying. I'm stating that they probably be poorer without the USSR.
Aug 2 2024 1:28:37 PM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0