post by @TheEternalKraut
back to @TheEternalKraut's posts@nitrrogen__ I dont think we can ever wager what’s necessarily moral or immoral but I use a Utilitarian approach to morality when it comes to interpersonal conflict or atleast insofar as preserving civilization
If X does good for humanity we should support X
If X does good for humanity we should support X
Sep 5 2024 12:07:12 AM
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 18210
- 0
- 7
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
Germanic Supremacist|Eugenicist|Utilitarian|Wehraboo|Arch-Germanic Slavaphobe|Edits occasionally idk|Disc is drangnachosten88
- Bavaria, Germany
- substack.com/@ultrainstinct…
registered Jul 20 2024 12:11 AM
970 following
796 followers
in reply to:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut "Good" & "bad" aren't objective & universal terms unless you're a moralist.
Sep 5 2024 12:06:13 AM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
Explaining Russian Brutality
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers
references to this tweet:
replies:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut Doing 'good' for humanity is also subjective. Some people believe that certain values, ideas, theories, and their realization - are universally and necessarily 'good' for humanity. These ideas vary from person to person and from philosophy to philosophy.
Sep 5 2024 12:11:20 AM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0