post by @TheEternalKraut
back to @TheEternalKraut's posts@nitrrogen__ Yeah but a humans perception on what poses the most utility isn’t a definitive authority on what is most correct either
Sep 5 2024 12:15:43 AM
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 18210
- 0
- 2
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
Germanic Supremacist|Eugenicist|Utilitarian|Wehraboo|Arch-Germanic Slavaphobe|Edits occasionally idk|Disc is drangnachosten88
- Bavaria, Germany
- substack.com/@ultrainstinct…
registered Jul 20 2024 12:11 AM
970 following
796 followers
in reply to:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut >"What's good for humanity is case by case."
Yeah, exactly.
Naturally, our views on what's good for humanity and what isn't are fundamentally different.
Sep 5 2024 12:14:48 AM
Yeah, exactly.
Naturally, our views on what's good for humanity and what isn't are fundamentally different.
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
Explaining Russian Brutality
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers
references to this tweet:
replies:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
@TheEternalKraut If one attempts to establish a framework for empirically measuring 'utility', the issue of certain philosophies disagreeing on what is utility and what is more important still persists.
Sep 5 2024 12:23:10 AM
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0