post by @good_virtues
back to @good_virtues's posts@nitrrogen__ Those principalities, better put city-states, shared their cultural relation but Moscow was the most far-off of them and influenced by Mongols & other Turkics, especially Tatar elites. There was no "Suzdal Rus" for instance. All of the outgrowths attributed to, and from Moscow…
Aug 11 2024 7:54:49 PM
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 41087
- 0
- 11
posted by:
(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)
Free The Northwest
---
Advocate for the Butler Plan, N.W.T.I.
Desiring a Sovereign, Independent Nation in the PNW
Political Platonist
Race Patriot
Cosmotheist
- Carcass of America
- archive.org/details/cosmot…
registered Oct 9 2018 5:18 AM
1559 following
1281 followers
in reply to:
nitrrogen
@nitrrogen__
1. Saying any state is a successor of the Rus is wholly inaccurate. The Rus was not a state, it was merely a collection of principalities who were loosely united due to shared cultural and ethnic heritage.
2. Muscovy, Novgorod, etc, were never directly part of the Mongols. 🧵 x.com/good_virtues/s… (⊹)
Aug 11 2024 10:22:14 AM
2. Muscovy, Novgorod, etc, were never directly part of the Mongols. 🧵 x.com/good_virtues/s… (⊹)
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 9
- 1
- 98
users mentioned:
replied-to user:
Explaining Russian brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia.
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers