crossixir.com

post by @nitrrogen__

back to @nitrrogen__'s posts
nitrrogen @nitrrogen__
But these developments are still based on the foundational concepts of logic that existed long before the emergence of analytical philosophy.

Also, the constant repetition of questions like defining "exist" or "real" is a 'begging the question fallacy', as said words... pic.x.com/ljmpowexud
Sep 4 2024 2:43:00 AM
  • replies 1
  • retweets 0
  • quote tweets 0
  • likes 9145
  • bookmarks 0
  • impressions 0

links:


posted by:

(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)

Explaining Russian Brutality
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers

in reply to:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__
Instead, it adopted and refined existing systems of logic (such as predicate logic and modal logic) to suit its purposes (or created new forms of logic e.g., symbolic logic, modal logic, and non-classical logics).
Sep 4 2024 2:42:58 AM
  • replies 1
  • retweets 0
  • quote tweets 0
  • likes 0
  • bookmarks 0
  • impressions 0

users mentioned:

replied-to user:

Explaining Russian 🇷🇺 brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia
  • location Wagner PMC deployment in Syria
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers

references to this tweet:

replies:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__
…all have circular definitions.
It's all horseshit, if you try to define them you run into the issue that words like "real" or "exist" have different meanings in different philosophical or everyday contexts.

For example:
Sep 4 2024 2:43:01 AM
  • replies 1
  • retweets 0
  • quote tweets 0
  • likes 0
  • bookmarks 0
  • impressions 0

sources


later tweet earlier tweet