post by @nitrrogen__

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

…all have circular definitions.
It's all horseshit, if you try to define them you run into the issue that words like "real" or "exist" have different meanings in different philosophical or everyday contexts.

For example:

Sep 4 2024 2:43:01 AM

1
0
0
9145
0
0

posted by:

(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

Explaining Russian Brutality

registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM

255 following

472 followers

in reply to:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

But these developments are still based on the foundational concepts of logic that existed long before the emergence of analytical philosophy.

Also, the constant repetition of questions like defining "exist" or "real" is a 'begging the question fallacy', as said words... pic.x.com/ljmpowexud

Sep 4 2024 2:43:00 AM

users mentioned:

replied-to user:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

Explaining Russian 🇷🇺 brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia

Wagner PMC deployment in Syria

registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM

255 following

472 followers

references to this tweet:

replies:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

In a scientific context, "real" is something that can be empirically measured or observed.

In a mathematical context, "exist" refers to the existence of a number or solution that satisfies an equation.

Sep 4 2024 2:43:01 AM

sources

later tweet earlier tweet